Comparison of radiofrequency thermocoagulation targeted therapy with other therapies

Principle puncture needle diameter Surgical consumables Radio frequency target thermocoagulation therapy for direct decompression, inactivation of inflammatory factors, repair of damaged annulus fibrosus 0.7 mm puncture cannula (about 360 yuan/piece),

It can be repeatedly sterilized and used about 50 times of collagenase nucleolysis to dissolve collagen. 0.7 mm collagenase preparation, one-time use, about 500 yuan each 3.4mm

5.4mm incision and suction device, reusable PLDD central indirect >1mm therapeutic electrode thousands of yuan/piece, one-time use of ozone nucleolysis for decompression and inactivation of inflammatory factors 1mm puncture needle for radiofrequency ablation nucleoplasty The central indirect 1mm therapeutic electrode in the interdisc is several thousand yuan/piece, the one-time use of IDET to repair the ruptured annulus fibrosus 1.2mm therapeutic electrode is more than 10,000 yuan/piece, the comparison of one-time use of radiofrequency target thermocoagulation therapy and other minimally invasive spine therapies ——Comparison of safety performance After puncture positioning, infection injury blood vessels or nerve injury normal nucleus pulposus tissue radiofrequency target thermocoagulation imaging equipment, self-contained impedance monitoring, electrophysiological test system, no thermophysiological test, thermal effect can kill No sterilization bacteria, small diameter of puncture needle, electrophysiological testing system, very little collagenase nucleolysis, imaging localization is possible, multiple intervertebral disc endoscopy imaging localization is possible, endoscope is more likely to be large, percutaneous suction imaging localization is possible Imaging localization of PLDD may be possible with a large number of ozone nucleolysis imaging localization No, ozone has strong bactericidal function may be a large number of radiofrequency ablation nucleoplasty imaging localization may be less IDET imaging localization is not possible Multiple radiofrequency target thermocoagulation therapy Comparison with other minimally invasive spine therapies—comparison of patient acceptancetrauma operation time, intraoperative pain, hospitalization time, complications, operation cost, radio frequency targeted thermocoagulation therapy, minimal 5 minutes, minimal pain duration

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Therapies——Comparison of Curative Effects Excellent Rate, Complications, Recurrence, Side Effects, Radiofrequency Targeted Thermocoagulation Therapy 93%, no recovery, very little collagenase nucleolysis, 78-88%, such as postoperative pain, spinal instability, etc. , such as allergies, mistaken entry into the subarachnoid space, 80-90% spinal instability, postoperative pain, infection and bleeding, damage to blood vessels and nerves, 80% of spinal instability, postoperative infection and bleeding, and damage to blood vessels. , Nerves may PLDD80-90% electrode rupture, psoas hematoma thermal damage may be ozone nucleolysis 80% No serious complications have been found to enter blood vessels, internal organs, etc., which can cause serious irreversible damage, may cause radiofrequency ablation nucleoplasty81 % Mild spinal instability, narrowing of the gap Improper operation can cause thermal damage to the nervous system, possibly IDET52%Improper operation can cause thermal damage to the nervous system. Possible comparison of radiofrequency targeted thermocoagulation therapy with other minimally invasive spine therapies—adaptation Symptom comparisonCervical puncture site Lumbar puncture site Indications Radiofrequency target thermocoagulation therapy The intrathecal space approach The medial edge of the facet joint, the lateral approach, the nerve root outlet approach, in short, the individualized approach 1. Discogenic low back pain 2. Disc herniation other than cauda equina syndrome, intervertebral disc crisis, and bony stenosis of the spinal canal, 3. Peripheral neuralgia 4. Soft tissue pain 5. Tendon terminal syndrome 6. Sympathetic nerve damage 7. Cancer pain 8. Neurosurgery Application 9. Cervical disc herniation other than posterior longitudinal ligament ossification syndrome, including spinal collagenase nucleocapsular space, medial border approach of facet joint in retrodural space,

Safe triangular approach (intradiscal) for mild to moderate disc herniation is effective for some prolapsed nucleus pulposus. Spinal stenosis percutaneous suction intrathecal space approach safe triangular approach inclusive mild to moderate intervertebral disc herniation PLDD intrathecal space approach safe triangular approach inclusive, hypertonic mild to moderate intervertebral disc herniation ozone solution Nuclear surgery intrathecal space approach facet joint medial border approach

Safe triangle approach for mild to moderate disc herniation and intervertebral disc edema Total annuloplasty without safety triangle discogenic low back pain radiofrequency ablation nucleoplasty IDET does not conduct safety triangle discogenic low back pain

If you have any questions, please contact us. Our company can produce various customized needles, medical needles, puncture needles, hypodermic needles, biopsy needles, vaccine needles, injection needles, syringe needles, veterinary needles, pencil point needle, ovum pick up needles, spinal needles, etc. If you need customized needle products, please contact us. We look forward to your inquiry! The quality of the products manufactured in our factory will surely satisfy you!

Please contact us if you need: zhang@sz-manners.com